В IELTS Speaking среди критериев есть такой в Lexical resource:
uses a wide vocabulary resource readily and flexibly to convey precise meaning
Все обычно хорошо понимают первую часть — нужно использовать широкий диапазон слов. А вот вторая часть to convey precise meaning не всегда учитывается. Вот ее и разберем сегодня.
☝️ Ваша задача не просто разбросать по речи множество слов, но и точно использовать их в контексте, максимально корректно передать смысл того, что хотите сказать.
Например, используя базовый вокабуляр, вы можете сказать:
😐 The event was interesting.
Ничего плохого во фразе нет, но... how interesting? what do you mean by saying 'interesting'?
😮 Did you mean 'unusual' or 'unexpected'? Then it was quirky.
🤩 Did you use 'interesting' meaning it captured your attention? Then it was enthralling or captivating.
🤨 Or maybe the event was strange (in an unpleasant way)? Then you could use the words odd or peculiar or bizarre.
🥳 Was the event of a far-reaching importance? Then it was momentous. Сравните: an interesting event in history vs. a momentous event in history.
Все эти слова более точно передают смысл базового слова 'interesting' (и добавляют вам баллы за flexible LR).
🔥 Мне кажется, хорошая тема для постоянной рубрики — будем брать базовое слово и рассматривать его в разных контекстах, что скажете, сделать рубрику? #ielts_vocabulary
В IELTS Speaking среди критериев есть такой в Lexical resource:
uses a wide vocabulary resource readily and flexibly to convey precise meaning
Все обычно хорошо понимают первую часть — нужно использовать широкий диапазон слов. А вот вторая часть to convey precise meaning не всегда учитывается. Вот ее и разберем сегодня.
☝️ Ваша задача не просто разбросать по речи множество слов, но и точно использовать их в контексте, максимально корректно передать смысл того, что хотите сказать.
Например, используя базовый вокабуляр, вы можете сказать:
😐 The event was interesting.
Ничего плохого во фразе нет, но... how interesting? what do you mean by saying 'interesting'?
😮 Did you mean 'unusual' or 'unexpected'? Then it was quirky.
🤩 Did you use 'interesting' meaning it captured your attention? Then it was enthralling or captivating.
🤨 Or maybe the event was strange (in an unpleasant way)? Then you could use the words odd or peculiar or bizarre.
🥳 Was the event of a far-reaching importance? Then it was momentous. Сравните: an interesting event in history vs. a momentous event in history.
Все эти слова более точно передают смысл базового слова 'interesting' (и добавляют вам баллы за flexible LR).
🔥 Мне кажется, хорошая тема для постоянной рубрики — будем брать базовое слово и рассматривать его в разных контекстах, что скажете, сделать рубрику? #ielts_vocabulary
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
Should You Buy Bitcoin?
In general, many financial experts support their clients’ desire to buy cryptocurrency, but they don’t recommend it unless clients express interest. “The biggest concern for us is if someone wants to invest in crypto and the investment they choose doesn’t do well, and then all of a sudden they can’t send their kids to college,” says Ian Harvey, a certified financial planner (CFP) in New York City. “Then it wasn’t worth the risk.” The speculative nature of cryptocurrency leads some planners to recommend it for clients’ “side” investments. “Some call it a Vegas account,” says Scott Hammel, a CFP in Dallas. “Let’s keep this away from our real long-term perspective, make sure it doesn’t become too large a portion of your portfolio.” In a very real sense, Bitcoin is like a single stock, and advisors wouldn’t recommend putting a sizable part of your portfolio into any one company. At most, planners suggest putting no more than 1% to 10% into Bitcoin if you’re passionate about it. “If it was one stock, you would never allocate any significant portion of your portfolio to it,” Hammel says.
